<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><article article-type="normal" xml:lang="en">
   <front>
      <journal-meta>
         <journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">PALEVO</journal-id>
         <issn>1631-0683</issn>
         <publisher>
            <publisher-name>Elsevier</publisher-name>
         </publisher>
      </journal-meta>
      <article-meta>
         <article-id pub-id-type="pii">S1631-0683(12)00087-5</article-id>
         <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.crpv.2012.06.006</article-id>
         <article-categories>
            <subj-group subj-group-type="type">
               <subject>Research article</subject>
            </subj-group>
            <subj-group subj-group-type="heading">
               <subject>Human palaeontology and prehistory (Prehistoric archaeology)</subject>
            </subj-group>
            <series-title>Paléontologie humaine et préhistoire / Human palaeontology and prehistory</series-title>
            <series-title>(Archéologie préhistorique / Prehistoric archaeology)</series-title>
         </article-categories>
         <title-group>
            <article-title>Direct dating of a Neolithic burial in the Laang Spean cave (Battambang Province, Cambodia): First regional chrono-cultural implications</article-title>
            <trans-title-group xml:lang="fr">
               <trans-title>Datation directe d’une sépulture néolithique en grotte (Laang Spean, Province de Battambang, Cambodge) : premières implications chrono-culturelles régionales</trans-title>
            </trans-title-group>
         </title-group>
         <contrib-group content-type="authors">
            <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes">
               <name>
                  <surname>Zeitoun</surname>
                  <given-names>Valéry</given-names>
               </name>
               <email>pythecanthro@gmail.com</email>
               <xref rid="aff0005" ref-type="aff">
                  <sup>a</sup>
               </xref>
            </contrib>
            <contrib contrib-type="author">
               <name>
                  <surname>Forestier</surname>
                  <given-names>Hubert</given-names>
               </name>
               <xref rid="aff0010" ref-type="aff">
                  <sup>b</sup>
               </xref>
            </contrib>
            <contrib contrib-type="author">
               <name>
                  <surname>Sophady</surname>
                  <given-names>Heng</given-names>
               </name>
               <xref rid="aff0015" ref-type="aff">
                  <sup>c</sup>
               </xref>
            </contrib>
            <contrib contrib-type="author">
               <name>
                  <surname>Puaud</surname>
                  <given-names>Simon</given-names>
               </name>
               <xref rid="aff0020" ref-type="aff">
                  <sup>d</sup>
               </xref>
            </contrib>
            <contrib contrib-type="author">
               <name>
                  <surname>Billault</surname>
                  <given-names>Laurence</given-names>
               </name>
               <xref rid="aff0010" ref-type="aff">
                  <sup>b</sup>
               </xref>
            </contrib>
            <aff-alternatives id="aff0005">
               <aff>
                  <label>a</label> UMR 9993 CNRS, Musée Guimet, 19, avenue d’Iéna, 75116 Paris, France</aff>
            </aff-alternatives>
            <aff-alternatives id="aff0010">
               <aff>
                  <label>b</label> UMR208 IRD-MNHN, 57, rue Cuvier, 75005 Paris, France</aff>
            </aff-alternatives>
            <aff-alternatives id="aff0015">
               <aff>
                  <label>c</label> Ministère de la Culture et des Beaux-Arts de Phnom Penh, 227, Kbal Thnal, Preah Norodom Boulevard, Sangkat Tonle Bassac, Khan Chamkar Mon, 12305 Phnom Penh, Cambodia</aff>
            </aff-alternatives>
            <aff-alternatives id="aff0020">
               <aff>
                  <label>d</label> UMR 7194 du CNRS-MNHN, 1, rue René-Panhard, 75013 Paris, France</aff>
            </aff-alternatives>
         </contrib-group>
         <pub-date-not-available/>
         <volume>11</volume>
         <issue seq="2">7</issue>
         <issue-id pub-id-type="pii">S1631-0683(12)X0007-1</issue-id>
         <fpage seq="0" content-type="normal">529</fpage>
         <lpage content-type="normal">537</lpage>
         <history>
            <date date-type="received" iso-8601-date="2012-04-24"/>
            <date date-type="accepted" iso-8601-date="2012-06-08"/>
         </history>
         <permissions>
            <copyright-statement>© 2012 Académie des sciences. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.</copyright-statement>
            <copyright-year>2012</copyright-year>
            <copyright-holder>Académie des sciences</copyright-holder>
         </permissions>
         <self-uri xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" content-type="application/pdf" xlink:href="main.pdf">
                        Full (PDF)
                    </self-uri>
         <abstract abstract-type="author">
            <p id="spar0005">If, because of recent geo-political events which took place in Cambodia, the remarkable discovery made at the end of the 19th century on the banks of Lake Tonle Sap of the Neolithic site of Samrong Sen has fallen from current public knowledge, Neolithic sites situated in caves remain the least-well documented of sites throughout the whole of South-East Asia. The discovery of a Neolithic burial in a cave dating from 3310 BP is the significant result of recent prehistoric excavations commenced in 2009. This discovery provides us with an original chronological, cultural landmark for South-East Asia, at the beginning of the Ages of Metal. An in-depth description of this grave allows us to envisage preliminary regional comparisons, thereby permitting a broader taking into consideration of the evolution of funereal practices in this part of the world.</p>
         </abstract>
         <trans-abstract abstract-type="author" xml:lang="fr">
            <p id="spar0010">Si du fait des événements géopolitiques récents au Cambodge la découverte marquante faite à la fin du <sc>xix</sc>
               <sup>e</sup> siècle sur les berges du lac Tonle Sap du site néolithique de Samrong Sen est tombé dans l’oubli, les sites néolithiques en grotte demeurent les moins documentés pour l’ensemble de l’Asie du Sud-est. Résultat significatif d’une nouvelle recherche préhistorique entreprise depuis 2009 dans la grotte de Laang Spean, la découverte d’une inhumation néolithique datée de 3310 BP offre un jalon chronoculturel original pour l’Asie du Sud-Est qui, à cette date, s’ouvre à la métallurgie. Une description détaillée de cette sépulture permet d’envisager une première comparaison régionale et ouvre ainsi à une réflexion plus large sur l’évolution des pratiques funéraires dans cette région du monde.</p>
         </trans-abstract>
         <kwd-group>
            <unstructured-kwd-group>Southeast Asia, Prehistory, Field-anthropology</unstructured-kwd-group>
         </kwd-group>
         <kwd-group xml:lang="fr">
            <unstructured-kwd-group>Asie du Sud-est, Préhistoire, Anthropologie de terrain</unstructured-kwd-group>
         </kwd-group>
         <custom-meta-group>
            <custom-meta>
               <meta-name>presented</meta-name>
               <meta-value>Presented by Yves Coppens</meta-value>
            </custom-meta>
         </custom-meta-group>
      </article-meta>
   </front>
   <body>
      <sec id="sec0005">
         <label>1</label>
         <title>Introduction</title>
         <p id="par0005">If pottery elements, considered as being characteristic of the Neolithic Period, appear to be more and more ancient in China (<xref rid="bib0010" ref-type="bibr">Boaretto et al., 2009</xref>, <xref rid="bib0110" ref-type="bibr">Liu, 2009</xref> and <xref rid="bib0115" ref-type="bibr">Lu, 2011</xref>), these remains, together with polished stone – axes, adzes, sickles and chisels – remain less characteristic or totally uncharacteristic of South-East continental Asia. These diffuse objects are found in isolation within a regional Hoabinhian context, which is very different to that which exists elsewhere in the world at that epoch (<xref rid="bib0025" ref-type="bibr">Cauwe et al., 2007</xref>, <xref rid="bib0040" ref-type="bibr">Demoule, 2009</xref> and <xref rid="bib0065" ref-type="bibr">Guilaine, 2011</xref>). Furthermore, these rare Neolithic objects were quickly replaced by those emanating from the Metal Ages. Thus, the Neolithic and Metal Ages jumble together – as can be seen in the chronological-cultural sequence found on the Ban Chiang site in Thailand (<xref rid="bib0220" ref-type="bibr">White, 2008</xref>) with an “Early Bronze Age” contemporary with regional sites which were “still” Neolithic, and also the series of datings on the Khok Phanom Di site (Higham and Bananurang, 1990) or even the Ban Non Wat site (<xref rid="bib0090" ref-type="bibr">Higham, 2008</xref>). In addition, the North-East and the maritime strip of Central Thailand, which are the regions situated the closest to the Battambang province where the cave of Laang Spean is situated, witnessed the development of burial grounds with metal objects found as part of grave offerings. These two regions of Thailand, where sites are numerous and the best archaeologically-documented for the region (<xref rid="bib0080" ref-type="bibr">Higham, 2002</xref>), seem to indicate the development of burial grounds and a clear separation between collective burial grounds and habitations (<xref rid="bib0085" ref-type="bibr">Higham, 2004</xref>). For Cambodia, only a small amount of recent prehistorically chronological-cultural data exists. So it is for the upper levels of Laang Spean, excavated in the 1960s, which were dated as being 4000 ± 90 BP (non calibrated) (<xref rid="bib0135" ref-type="bibr">Mourer, 1977</xref>) and for which is attributed a clay pot with an annular pedestal (<xref rid="bib0125" ref-type="bibr">Mourer and Mourer, 1971</xref>) found on numerous Neolithic sites in Thailand. However, as far as burials in caves are concerned, data is very scarce, as it is for the whole of South-East Asia, and it is possible that the troglodyte milieu distinguishes itself from open-air sites, thereby begging the question regarding the function of a site–as, for example, the Cambodian Neolithic site of Samrong Sen.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec0010">
         <label>2</label>
         <title>Laang Spean cave burial site</title>
         <sec>
            <p id="par0010">Discovered in 1965 by Cécile and Roland Mourer during a systematic survey of the limestone massifs in the Battambang region, the Lang Spean cave is situated on the edge of Sdao village mid-way between Battambang town and Pailin, close to the frontier with Thailand (<xref rid="fig0005" ref-type="fig">Fig. 1</xref>). Nesting at an altitude of some 100 m at the summit of Phnom Teak Trang, which contains fifty caves and rock shelters inhabited in prehistoric times, Laang Spean has a ground surface of approximately 1000 m<sup>2</sup>, measures 30 m high and consists of three main chambers of which the roof of the largest has fallen-in. Excavations were halted for a time in 1970 owing to local problems but in 2009, meticulous excavations of 8 m<sup>2</sup> took place in the second chamber which is situated in a central position (<xref rid="fig0010" ref-type="fig">Fig. 2</xref>). The dig was used for training purposes within the context of the Franco-Cambodian Prehistoric Mission (<xref rid="bib0060" ref-type="bibr">Forestier et al., 2012</xref>). The ensemble of the stratigraphical sequence of Laang Spean led to a first series of radiocarbon dating, indicating a minimum date of 8500 BP (non calibrated) for the Lower Hoabinhian level and a more recent date of 1200 ± 70 BP (non calibrated) (<xref rid="bib0130" ref-type="bibr">Mourer et al., 1970</xref> and <xref rid="bib0140" ref-type="bibr">Mourer, 1994</xref>). Isolated human remains had been found during the initial excavations (<xref rid="bib0140" ref-type="bibr">Mourer, 1994</xref>) and our further research revealed new fragments of human bones, which once collected and analysed in terms of nature, ages and different apparel, showed that at least five different individuals had been interred in the second Laang Spean chamber. The grave of an adult individual was found on the last day of our excavations which was intrusive to the Hohabinian levels (<xref rid="fig0010" ref-type="fig">Fig. 2</xref>). In-line with field-anthropology reading (<xref rid="bib0045" ref-type="bibr">Duday, 2009</xref>, <xref rid="bib0050" ref-type="bibr">Duday et al., 1990</xref> and <xref rid="bib0055" ref-type="bibr">Duday and Guillon, 2006</xref>) for which the aim is to determine the original positioning of the defunct at the time of burial (<xref rid="fig0015" ref-type="fig">Fig. 3</xref>).</p>
         </sec>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec0015">
         <label>3</label>
         <title>Materials and methods</title>
         <sec>
            <p id="par0015">The human bone remains found during the dig do not include a complete skeleton, but several skeletal parts still in anatomical connection and this, associated with offerings, led us to state that this was well and truly a grave. Differential preservation of the different bone specimens was notable. In fact, if the bones found during the dig are generally in a very fragile condition, whole long bones and fragments of such (humerus and lower limbs) found were relatively well-preserved. On the other hand, no sign of cutting or the results of gnawing were observed. The calvaria was not found and only the left part of the jawbone was discovered. The latter was completely without teeth, canines and molars having dropped out ante mortem; a remodelling of the alveolar bone of these mandibular teeth attesting to the theory. The spinal column was represented only by a fragment of the body from the sixth thoracic vertebra found in the neck area, and by similar fragments from the ninth, tenth and eleventh lumbar situated close to the sacrum which itself was broken and eroded in its posterior area. The distal part of the right pelvis and the left coxal bone were practically complete but the rib-cage was only represented by a dozen fragments of ribs – all unconnected but found within the thoracic cavity. Concerning the upper limbs, the right humerus was still connected to the scapula but the right radius and ulna had disappeared as had the left scapula. The left humerus was incomplete in its proximal portion and was situated in the place of the right forearm with the distal parts of the incomplete left radius and ulna in a disorderly state at the right elbow place within the thoracic volume. As far as the right hand is concerned, the scaphoid, the capitatum and the lunatum were found in the basin. Concerning the left hand, the metacarpal bone I and its proximal phalanges, middle and distal of metacarpal bone II, the proximal phalanges, and middle and distal of metacarpal bones III, IV and MV were still connected next to the proximal part of the left femur. For the right hand, the metacarpal bone I and its proximal and distal phalanges, as well as the distal and middle phalanges of the metacarpal bone II were anatomically connected whereas the proximal phalanges of metacarpal bones III and IV were in close contact. The whole of the hand must have been closed with fingers and thumbs tight together, the ensemble placed next to the proximal part of the right femur in symmetrical fashion to the left hand. The lower limbs are better represented with only the left patella and all of the phalanges of the right foot missing.</p>
         </sec>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec0020">
         <label>4</label>
         <title>Burial description and interpretation</title>
         <sec>
            <p id="par0020">The grave was dug on a north-south axis with the head of the deceased placed towards the south. The edges of the grave were only clearly visible for some 45 cm at the bottom of the latter. Taking into consideration these anatomical observations, it is possible to establish the initial positioning of the body before the anatomical elements were disrupted. Thus, it would seem that this individual had been laid in supine position with the arms straight and the hands touching the upper part of the lower limbs. The legs were straight with the feet being placed tightly together. During decomposition, rotation of the lower limbs towards the outside of the cadaver had made the soles of the feet face outwards which suggested that the feet had initially been in a vertical position – perhaps pushed-up against the sides of the grave thereby maintaining the knees in an elevated position in relation to the hips and the feet. It is possible to put forward the hypothesis that the clothing had maintained the lower limbs in anatomical connection. In the absence of any indication of the presence of any burrowing animal, it would seem that the grave had been disturbed at some time. In fact, the discovery of an over-turned pot, of several broken pots over a large limestone block situated on the thorax of the buried individual and the scattering of bone and pottery pieces on the block suggests that the grave had been opened and re-sealed at a time following decomposition of the body. As the position of several anatomical parts and joints (distal parts of hands, patellas, tibias, tarsals, metatarsals and phalanges, etc.) had either remained in their original positions or been moved together after decomposition of the flesh, it was possible to reconstruct where and how grave disturbers had displaced the different anatomical remains and pottery pieces. In the same way, anatomical articulations could be replaced and pottery remains reconstructed which led to our being able to work out the original conditions of the burial in terms of positioning of the corpse and of the grave goods.</p>
         </sec>
         <sec>
            <p id="par0025">As the bone remains were fragile, only the biological data collected on-site enabled us to establish that this was the grave of an adult male with 99.76% probability according to the DSP Method (<xref rid="bib0150" ref-type="bibr">Murail et al., 2005</xref>). His height had been 170 ± 2.3 cm according to Chusiri's Regional Anthropological Tables <xref rid="bib0030" ref-type="bibr">(1991)</xref> on the basis of the maximal length of his femurs.</p>
         </sec>
         <sec>
            <p id="par0030">Several objects associated with the burial can be interpreted as being funereal offerings: a large earthenware globular jar had been placed on the lower part of the legs, just below the knees, an ochre pencil and a tortoise shell had been laid-out between the legs underneath the jar. Five other pottery items had also been placed around the body, around the head and down to the upper left member. These pottery objects were of two principal ceramic types: jars and cup-like bowls with ring-shaped bases (<xref rid="fig0020" ref-type="fig">Fig. 4</xref>). Additionally, a lower, left pierced canine belonging to a Suid was found at plexus level and would suggest the presence of an item of necklace and a preform of a green-coloured adze in fine greywake was also found in the grave whereas the cranium of a large bovid, broken in situ, was found on the limestone blocks within the pit (<xref rid="fig0025" ref-type="fig">Fig. 5</xref>).</p>
         </sec>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec0025">
         <label>5</label>
         <title>Chronological elements</title>
         <sec>
            <p id="par0035">Knowledge concerning the chronological development of pottery in Cambodia is still patchy when compared to that of more recent developments relating to Classical and Pre-Angkorian periods (<xref rid="bib0120" ref-type="bibr">Micksic, 2003</xref>). Ancient pottery items discovered at Laang Spean in the 1960's and 1970's were divided into two distinct groups by <xref rid="bib0145" ref-type="bibr">Mourer (1986)</xref> with, in one group, corded marked or paddle marked pottery from the Late Hohabinhian dating from 6240 ± 70 BP (non calibrated), followed by a second group of incised and impressed ware Neolithic pottery dating from between 3970 ± 90 BP and 4000 ± 90 BP (non calibrated). Cup-shaped examples with a ring-shaped base which we found in the grave are identical to those found earlier (<xref rid="bib0125" ref-type="bibr">Mourer and Mourer, 1971</xref>). One radiocarbon dating carried out on the bone collagen of the deceased gave a calibrated date of 3310 ± 29 BP (Wk 30118) (<xref rid="fig0010" ref-type="fig">Fig. 2</xref>) with a δ<sup>13</sup>C of –13.9, which suggests the possibility of a diet which included food from marine origin towards the end of his life (analytical report F. Petchey). Even if a rigorous comparison of uncalibrated ancient datings with modern calibrated datings has been put forward (<xref rid="bib0100" ref-type="bibr">Higham and Higham, 2009</xref>) for South-East Asiatic sites, the gap which exists between these two types of dating does allow the suggesting of a preliminary regional comparison chart for the most recent Neolithic period.</p>
         </sec>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec0030">
         <label>6</label>
         <title>Discussion</title>
         <sec>
            <p id="par0040">As far as graves contemporary with that at Laang Spean in Cambodia are concerned, several have been brought to light on the banks of Lake Tonle Sap, at Samrong Sen which is one of the earliest prehistoric sites in the world to have been described (<xref rid="bib0020" ref-type="bibr">Cartailhac, 1877</xref>). Levels of accumulated shells have been dated as being at least 3230 ± 120 years BP (non calibrated) (<xref rid="bib0015" ref-type="bibr">Carbonnel and Delibrias, 1968</xref>). Dating of 3995 ± 160 BP recently obtained (<xref rid="bib0215" ref-type="bibr">Vana, 2002</xref>) would indicate the end of the Neolithic period thereby confirming the previous estimate. Other dating carried-out in the Phnom Loang C62b cave at Kampot, in southern Cambodia (<xref rid="bib0015" ref-type="bibr">Carbonnel and Delibrias, 1968</xref>) mentioned traces of Neolithic occupation of around 4370 ± 135 BP (non calibrated), but this occupation has been challenged (<xref rid="bib0140" ref-type="bibr">Mourer, 1994</xref>). In the North-West of Cambodia, in that part of Baray to the west of Angkor, reconstruction work on the buildings and temples by École Française d’Extrême-Orient presented the possibility of carrying out an otherwise unplanned archaeological excavation in 2004 during an exceptionally dry period which facilitated greater access to a zone normally covered by the waters of a reservoir. Thus, the work carried out at Koh Ta Méas (<xref rid="bib0185" ref-type="bibr">Pottier, 2006</xref>) indicated the presence of several burials including that of an adult buried in supine position with the upper limbs stretched out alongside the body on a NE-SW axis. According to the documentation (<xref rid="bib0180" ref-type="bibr">Pottier, 2004</xref>: p. 49), it would seem that the feet joints had become set during decomposition. During this process of decomposition, the femurs rotated in an exaggerated fashion towards the outside of the body mass which would suggest a collapsing of the hips which had been placed on a cushion of degradable matter. A lateral constraint seems also to have restricted the scapular belt, which suggests that a shroud or other garment had been in place. Four pottery items had been placed in a line on either side of the corpse. A cup-shaped object with a ringed base was found towards the top of the crown and a Suid's skull had been placed at the feet. In addition to the pottery offerings and of the initial position of the deceased, as at Laang Spean, turtle bones were also found in the grave. The first Radiocarbon dating carried out on a piece of charcoal taken from infill of the grave gave an age of 2870 ± 60 BP (<xref rid="bib0185" ref-type="bibr">Pottier, 2006</xref>) suggests a more recent date than that for Laang Spean but a new series of radiocarbon dating on elements found in the grave results in an age of between 2870 and 3400 BP (Pottier, oral report) which is closer to the direct dating carried out at Laang Spean.</p>
         </sec>
         <sec>
            <p id="par0045">The Neolithic Age, curiously enough, remains less-known in both continental and insular South-East Asia than the Metal Ages and even more ancient populations going back to Palaeolithic times. In addition, the chronological range of Neolithic occupations in South-East Asia has recently varied from the fifth millennium to the end of the third millennium BC with the beginning of the Bronze Age occurring between the end of the third millennium and the end of the second BC (<xref rid="bib0100" ref-type="bibr">Higham and Higham, 2009</xref>). Notwithstanding the very recent discovery of a Neolithic occupation in Burma (<xref rid="bib0155" ref-type="bibr">Pautreau and Maitay, 2010</xref>), in the Samon valley, Thailand offers the most significant data on agrarian populations at the end of the Neolithic Age (c.a. 3500 BP). More often than not, such data comes from open-air burial sites such as Khok Phanom Di, Ban Chiang, Non Kao Noi, Ban Phak Top or Ban Kao (<xref rid="bib0085" ref-type="bibr">Higham, 2004</xref> and <xref rid="bib0200" ref-type="bibr">Sorensen, 1967</xref>) which are marked by several phases of occupation described according to the stylistic evolution of pottery objects decorated by a comb with an incised and dotted motif. However, if the main characteristic style of incised and dotted pottery was its sudden appearance towards the second half of the third millennium BP on Neolithic sites situated in the plains of the main rivers of continental South-East Asia (<xref rid="bib0190" ref-type="bibr">Rispoli, 2007</xref>), the typological characteristics of pottery in this region remain largely incomplete and its chronology imprecise – even as far as the Metal Ages. According a date to these objects is done indirectly by dating organic material remains (shells and charcoal) extracted from the infill of graves.</p>
         </sec>
         <sec>
            <p id="par0050">In continental South-East Asia as a whole, however, is it possible to find elements of comparison between graves and to detect any evolution in funereal practices?</p>
         </sec>
         <sec>
            <p id="par0055">Material associated with the grave at Laang Spean cave consists of objects utilised for funereal purposes, which is frequently the case on sites in North-East Thailand at this date but for periods, however, identified as being from the Bronze Age (<xref rid="bib0075" ref-type="bibr">Higham, 1996</xref>). This, in fact, is the case for the presence of a plastron or of elements of a land turtle and the ochre pencil. The latter object, not extensively described in archaeological literature, however reveals a funereal practice which was quite common in the region as at Khok Phanom Di where the use of ochre was widespread throughout the site (<xref rid="bib0095" ref-type="bibr">Higham and Bannanurag, 1990</xref>) from ancient Neolithic times to the Bronze Age. Pottery offerings placed at the feet of the deceased, on the lower members or around the head was a practice which existed from North-East Thailand as far as Burma and seems to have continued until the Iron Age – however, for these more recent periods, evidence of the presence of a coffin would seem to be the most important aspect of funereal practice, even if the use of the latter can go back to the Bronze Age.</p>
         </sec>
         <sec>
            <p id="par0060">As in the Laang Spean cave, the graves on the Khok Phanom Di site in the lower reaches of the Bang Pakong River on the boundary of the Gulf of Siam, most of the burials were of individuals in supine position with their upper members straight alongside the body and the lower members extended straight (<xref rid="bib0005" ref-type="bibr">Bannanurag, 1991</xref>) but orientated east-west with the head towards the east. Evidence of the use of shrouds of a vegetable matter and even of a few coffins was found. Several graves contained pottery objects placed close to the lower members. In more rare cases turtle plastron was found but in practically all of the graves red ochre was found (<xref rid="bib0095" ref-type="bibr">Higham and Bannanurag, 1990</xref>). At Khok Phanom Di, six cultural phases have been described associated with dating which are principally spread between 3730 ± 100 and 3280 ± 140 BP (non calibrated) (<xref rid="bib0095" ref-type="bibr">Higham and Bannanurag, 1990</xref>) which is close to the age determined for de Laang Spean.</p>
         </sec>
         <sec>
            <p id="par0065">When one observes sites which are geographically close to Laang spean, information relating to the occupation of the spatial area arises – as is the case for several sites in the Mun or Chi valleys on the Khorat plateau described as being vast cemeteries situated away from habitations. In this way, the moated prehistoric site of Ban Non Wat situated on the western edge of the Khorat plateau in the upper reaches of the River Mun presents a first Neolithic phase (<xref rid="bib0085" ref-type="bibr">Higham, 2004</xref>) dated around 3600 and 3200 BP (non calibrated) characterised by extended supine inhumations associated with offerings. The use of caves as funereal sites situated away from habitations is therefore a fact which deserves closer investigation in the future but the development of the richness of the graves which lessen over time is also to be considered as is suggested by site at de Ban Non Wat with a second Neolithic phase dated between about 3200 and 2900 BP (non calibrated) which is marked by burials orientated east-west with less offerings than those found in the earlier phase but also mostly including globular cord-marked vessels and sometimes freshwater bivalve shells. This, however, creates a common Regional basis as far as funereal practices are concerned as similar graves were discovered further to the west, in Central Thailand, in the Khao Prachan valley and in the environs to the North of Lopburi. Thus, in the Ban Tha Kae habitation site, twenty-one inhumations were discovered, all orientated north-south, all with a vessel placed beyond the head and the feet and, in one case, under the knees with datings from 4450 to 3450 BP (non calibrated) (<xref rid="bib0085" ref-type="bibr">Higham, 2004</xref>) – which is very similar to Laang Spean. At the Khok Charoen site partly dated by thermo-luminescence to about 3350 to 2750 BP, funereal pottery items comprising vases with ring-shaped bases (pedestals) or another globular-shaped kind of vase with ornamentation edged by incised lines filled-in with printed or stamped surfaces also comparable to Laang Spean. Further to the west, in southern Thailand, at Laang Rongrien, explored by Anderson and dated 3720 BP (non calibrated), pedestal pots were found in a grave under a rock-shelter, associated with polished stone adze.</p>
         </sec>
         <sec>
            <p id="par0070">Other similarities exist throughout the region as a whole as far as northern Thailand where, close to the red ochre painted rock-shelter at Phratu Pha in Lampang province, for a time period of 3195 ± 55 BP to 2975 ± 65 BP (<xref rid="bib0210" ref-type="bibr">Srongsiri and Sangchan, 1997</xref> and <xref rid="bib0230" ref-type="bibr">Winalayai, 1999</xref>), pottery was also found near the head and the feet of adult individuals buried in supine position with limbs extended (<xref rid="bib0105" ref-type="bibr">Kongsuwan, 2001</xref>). A regional evolution is also perceptible, as at Pratu Pha, one of the bodies had been rolled-up in garments made from bark and another was buried in a wooden coffin – as is the case in north-eastern Thailand. Furthermore, in the Non Nok Tha cemetery, the deceased were placed in extended supine position with offerings such as pottery items, stone adze heads, grinding stones, cattle, pig and bivalve shells (<xref rid="bib0075" ref-type="bibr">Higham, 1996</xref>) but while the oldest graves were dated between 3950 and 3450 BP (non calibrated), the most recent between 3450 and 2950 BP (non calibrated) contained bronze objects marking an important change with the arrival of metallurgy in north-eastern Thailand.</p>
         </sec>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec0035">
         <label>7</label>
         <title>Perspectives</title>
         <sec>
            <p id="par0075">In the zone of expansion of southern China, the Late Neolithic Period (4450–3450 BP) has been documented by reference to different types of sites – caves, open-air or shellmiddens giving proof that the onset of a sedentary lifestyle, of agriculture and of the abandoning of stone-knapping were relatively well established. Innovations also appeared in the creation of new shapes in pottery items and of new technological developments and of decoration such as the use of vegetable-based temper and a wide range of decoration of incised motifs and geometrical painting as well as the possible use of a potter's wheel according to <xref rid="bib0190" ref-type="bibr">Rispoli (2007)</xref> who suggests that the practice of having recourse to burials with the defunct in extended supine position as opposed to flexed position was another innovation which originated in China and which extended towards the south. However, some graves with individuals in an extended position existed in the ancient Holocene period at Ban Rai in northern Thailand (<xref rid="bib0195" ref-type="bibr">Shoocongdej, 2006</xref>), and at Moh Khiew (<xref rid="bib0165" ref-type="bibr">Pookajorn, 1990</xref>, <xref rid="bib0170" ref-type="bibr">Pookajorn, 1994</xref> and <xref rid="bib0175" ref-type="bibr">Pookajorn, 2001</xref>) in the south. This supposes, therefore, that another cultural basis existed before this more recent Chinese influence. Is Cambodia one of those Asiatic southern continental domains where the basic ancient culture exists or does it constitute an area influenced by this practice, which came from China during a more recent period? In order to decide which of these hypotheses is the correct, it is first of all necessary to clearly describe, in as detailed a fashion as possible, the different modes of burial through following the method recommended by field-anthropology as developed nowadays in South-East Asia (<xref rid="bib0035" ref-type="bibr">Coupey et al., 2010</xref>, <xref rid="bib0070" ref-type="bibr">Harris, 2010</xref>, <xref rid="bib0160" ref-type="bibr">Pautreau et al., 2010</xref> and <xref rid="bib0225" ref-type="bibr">Willis and Tayles, 2009</xref>).</p>
         </sec>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec0040">
         <label>8</label>
         <title>Conclusion</title>
         <sec>
            <p id="par0080">It is not a question here of establishing definitive conclusions regarding the Laang Spean site for which excavations have only just re-started after years of abandonment; nor is it a question of finalising conclusions regarding Neolithic Cambodia as a whole which remains little known in terms of chronology and of the nature of objects which are characteristic of it. It is necessary today to take stock of new data which is susceptible of contributing to a chrono-cultural base of information, preferably through direct dating of individual burials rather than on the basis of dating obtained from the ensemble of pottery grave goods offerings or any organic material from the graves. This is the case with this first grave at Laang Spean, described as a whole. Taking into consideration all of the funereal elements known in the region, with the coming of cemeteries and of areas devoted to burials away from habitations around 4450–3450 BP in close-by North-East Thailand (<xref rid="bib0085" ref-type="bibr">Higham, 2004</xref>), and taking into account the presence of several individuals and also the existence of a fitted-out grave discovered during our recent excavations, the Laan Spean cave can be considered as a burial site cave and this raises the question of whether the cave was used for this sole activity or not in Late Neolithic times. Further excavations could bring an answer to this question but regarding funereal practices and their evolution in the region, only field-anthropology based studies could satisfy this aim.</p>
         </sec>
      </sec>
   </body>
   <back>
      <ack>
         <title>Acknowledgements</title>
         <p id="par0090">The results obtained would not have been possible without the support of H.E. Chuch Phoeurn, from Ministry of Culture in Cambodia, Phnom Penh; Mr Habtouch and Mr Ok Sophon, from the General Direction of Patrimony of the Ministry of Culture of Cambodia, Phnom Penh; Mr Ham Kimson, Director of the Department of Archaeology and Prehistory; Mr Top Tanleang, Director of the Department of Culture and Fine Arts for the province of Battambang and the Commission for Archaeological Exploration of the Ministry for Foreign and European Affairs in Paris and Mr D. Freslon, Counsellor for Cooperation and Cultural Action of the French Embassy in Cambodia. Our thanks are also extended to all of those who helped in the excavations as members of the Franco-Cambodian Prehistoric Mission, to Garry Holding for his helpful translation of the first version of this text and to Florent Detroit and Julio Bendezu-Sarmiento for their constructive comments.</p>
      </ack>
      <ref-list>
         <ref id="bib0005">
            <label>Bannanurag, 1991</label>
            <element-citation publication-type="article">
               <name>
                  <surname>Bannanurag</surname>
                  <given-names>R.</given-names>
               </name>
               <article-title>Khok Phanom Di Mortuary sequence data and social information</article-title>
               <source>BIPPA</source>
               <volume>10</volume>
               <year>1991</year>
               <page-range>204–209</page-range>
            </element-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="bib0010">
            <label>Boaretto et al., 2009</label>
            <element-citation publication-type="article">
               <name>
                  <surname>Boaretto</surname>
                  <given-names>E.</given-names>
               </name>
               <name>
                  <surname>Xiaohong</surname>
                  <given-names>W.</given-names>
               </name>
               <name>
                  <surname>Jiarong</surname>
                  <given-names>Y.</given-names>
               </name>
               <name>
                  <surname>Bar-Yosef</surname>
                  <given-names>O.</given-names>
               </name>
               <name>
                  <surname>Vikki</surname>
                  <given-names>C.</given-names>
               </name>
               <name>
                  <surname>Yan</surname>
                  <given-names>P.</given-names>
               </name>
               <name>
                  <surname>Kexin</surname>
                  <given-names>L.</given-names>
               </name>
               <name>
                  <surname>Cohen</surname>
                  <given-names>D.</given-names>
               </name>
               <name>
                  <surname>Tianlong</surname>
                  <given-names>J.</given-names>
               </name>
               <name>
                  <surname>Shuicheng</surname>
                  <given-names>L.</given-names>
               </name>
               <name>
                  <surname>Haibin</surname>
                  <given-names>G.</given-names>
               </name>
               <name>
                  <surname>Goldberg</surname>
                  <given-names>P.</given-names>
               </name>
               <name>
                  <surname>Weiner</surname>
                  <given-names>S.</given-names>
               </name>
               <article-title>Radiocarbon dating of charcoal and bone collagen associated with early pottery at Yuchanyan Cave, Hunan Province, China</article-title>
               <source>PNAS</source>
               <volume>106</volume>
               <year>2009</year>
               <page-range>9595–9600</page-range>
            </element-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="bib0015">
            <label>Carbonnel and Delibrias, 1968</label>
            <element-citation publication-type="article">
               <name>
                  <surname>Carbonnel</surname>
                  <given-names>J.-P.</given-names>
               </name>
               <name>
                  <surname>Delibrias</surname>
                  <given-names>H.</given-names>
               </name>
               <article-title>Premières datations absolues de trois gisements néolithiques cambodgiens</article-title>
               <source>C. R. Acad. Sci. Paris, Ser. D</source>
               <volume>267</volume>
               <year>1968</year>
               <page-range>1432–1434</page-range>
            </element-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="bib0020">
            <label>Cartailhac, 1877</label>
            <element-citation publication-type="book">
               <name>
                  <surname>Cartailhac</surname>
                  <given-names>E.</given-names>
               </name>
               <source>L’âge de la pierre dans l’Indo-Chine, Matériaux pour l’histoire primitive et naturelle de l’Homme</source>
               <year>1877</year>
               <publisher-name>Paris</publisher-name>
               <comment>p. 98–100</comment>
            </element-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="bib0025">
            <label>Cauwe et al., 2007</label>
            <element-citation publication-type="book">
               <name>
                  <surname>Cauwe</surname>
                  <given-names>N.</given-names>
               </name>
               <name>
                  <surname>Dolukhanov</surname>
                  <given-names>P.</given-names>
               </name>
               <name>
                  <surname>Kozlowski</surname>
                  <given-names>J.</given-names>
               </name>
               <name>
                  <surname>van Berg</surname>
                  <given-names>P.L.</given-names>
               </name>
               <source>Le Néolithique en Europe</source>
               <year>2007</year>
               <publisher-name>Colin</publisher-name>
               <publisher-loc>Paris</publisher-loc>
            </element-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="bib0030">
            <label>Chusiri, 1991</label>
            <element-citation publication-type="book">
               <name>
                  <surname>Chusiri</surname>
                  <given-names>P.</given-names>
               </name>
               <source>The principal study of human skeleton</source>
               <year>1991</year>
               <publisher-name>Fine Arts Department</publisher-name>
               <publisher-loc>Bangkok</publisher-loc>
            </element-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="bib0035">
            <label>Coupey et al., 2010</label>
            <element-citation publication-type="book">
               <name>
                  <surname>Coupey</surname>
                  <given-names>A.-S.</given-names>
               </name>
               <name>
                  <surname>Pautreau</surname>
                  <given-names>J.-P.</given-names>
               </name>
               <name>
                  <surname>Kyaw</surname>
                  <given-names>A.A.</given-names>
               </name>
               <source>Second field season at Ywa Gon Gyi burial site (Upper Burma). Bioarchaeology in Southeast Asia and the Pacific</source>
               <year>2010</year>
               <publisher-name>Newsletter</publisher-name>
               <comment>p. 17–18</comment>
            </element-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="bib0040">
            <label>Demoule, 2009</label>
            <element-citation publication-type="book">
               <name>
                  <surname>Demoule</surname>
                  <given-names>J.-P.</given-names>
               </name>
               <source>La révolution néolithique dans le monde</source>
               <year>2009</year>
               <publisher-name>CNRS éditions, Inrap/Universcience</publisher-name>
               <comment>497 p</comment>
            </element-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="bib0045">
            <label>Duday, 2009</label>
            <element-citation publication-type="book">
               <name>
                  <surname>Duday</surname>
                  <given-names>H.</given-names>
               </name>
               <source>The archaeology of the death: lectures in archaeothanatology</source>
               <year>2009</year>
               <publisher-name>Oxbow books</publisher-name>
               <publisher-loc>Oxford</publisher-loc>
            </element-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="bib0050">
            <label>Duday et al., 1990</label>
            <element-citation publication-type="article">
               <name>
                  <surname>Duday</surname>
                  <given-names>H.</given-names>
               </name>
               <name>
                  <surname>Courtaud</surname>
                  <given-names>P.</given-names>
               </name>
               <name>
                  <surname>Crubézy</surname>
                  <given-names>E.</given-names>
               </name>
               <name>
                  <surname>Sellier</surname>
                  <given-names>P.</given-names>
               </name>
               <name>
                  <surname>Tillier</surname>
                  <given-names>A.-M.</given-names>
               </name>
               <article-title>L’anthropologie de terrain, reconnaissance et interprétation des gestes funéraires</article-title>
               <source>Bull. Mem. Soc. Anthrop. Paris</source>
               <volume>2</volume>
               <year>1990</year>
               <page-range>29–50</page-range>
            </element-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="bib0055">
            <label>Duday and Guillon, 2006</label>
            <element-citation publication-type="book">
               <name>
                  <surname>Duday</surname>
                  <given-names>H.</given-names>
               </name>
               <name>
                  <surname>Guillon</surname>
                  <given-names>M.</given-names>
               </name>
               <source>Understanding the circumstances of decomposition when the body is skeletonised</source>
               <name>
                  <surname>Schmitt</surname>
                  <given-names>A.</given-names>
               </name>
               <name>
                  <surname>Cunha</surname>
                  <given-names>E.</given-names>
               </name>
               <name>
                  <surname>Pinheiro</surname>
                  <given-names>J.</given-names>
               </name>
               <article-title>Forensic Anthropology and Medicine Complementary Sciences from Recovery to Cause of Death</article-title>
               <year>2006</year>
               <publisher-name>Human Press</publisher-name>
               <publisher-loc>Totowa, New Jersey</publisher-loc>
               <page-range>117–157</page-range>
            </element-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="bib0060">
            <label>Forestier et al., 2012</label>
            <element-citation publication-type="book">
               <name>
                  <surname>Forestier</surname>
                  <given-names>H.</given-names>
               </name>
               <name>
                  <surname>Sophady</surname>
                  <given-names>H.</given-names>
               </name>
               <name>
                  <surname>Zeitoun</surname>
                  <given-names>V.</given-names>
               </name>
               <name>
                  <surname>Mourer</surname>
                  <given-names>R.</given-names>
               </name>
               <source>Le Cambodge avant l’Histoire : aux origines de la préhistoire Khmère. Le Cambodge avant l’Histoire : aux origines de la préhistoire Khmère</source>
               <name>
                  <surname>Lefèvre</surname>
                  <given-names>V.</given-names>
               </name>
               <article-title>Orientalismes. De l’archéologie au musée, Mélanges offerts à Jean-François Jarrige</article-title>
               <year>2012</year>
               <publisher-name>Brepols Publishers</publisher-name>
               <publisher-loc>Turnhout</publisher-loc>
               <page-range>193–212</page-range>
            </element-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="bib0065">
            <label>Guilaine, 2011</label>
            <element-citation publication-type="book">
               <name>
                  <surname>Guilaine</surname>
                  <given-names>J.</given-names>
               </name>
               <source>Caïn, Abel, Otzi. L’héritage néolithique</source>
               <year>2011</year>
               <publisher-name>Gallimard</publisher-name>
               <publisher-loc>Paris</publisher-loc>
               <comment>284 p</comment>
            </element-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="bib0070">
            <label>Harris, 2010</label>
            <mixed-citation>Harris, N. 2010. Disposing of dead: an investigation into prehistoric mortuary practices during the Neolithic and Bronze Ages at Ban Non Wat, Thesis of Master of Science, university of Otago, Dunedin New Zeland.</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="bib0075">
            <label>Higham, 1996</label>
            <element-citation publication-type="book">
               <name>
                  <surname>Higham</surname>
                  <given-names>C.</given-names>
               </name>
               <source>The Bronze Age of Southeast Asia</source>
               <year>1996</year>
               <publisher-name>Cambridge University Press</publisher-name>
               <publisher-loc>Cambridge</publisher-loc>
               <comment>381p</comment>
            </element-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="bib0080">
            <label>Higham, 2002</label>
            <element-citation publication-type="book">
               <name>
                  <surname>Higham</surname>
                  <given-names>C.</given-names>
               </name>
               <source>Early cultures of Mainland Southeast Asia</source>
               <year>2002</year>
               <publisher-name>River books</publisher-name>
               <publisher-loc>Bangkok</publisher-loc>
            </element-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="bib0085">
            <label>Higham, 2004</label>
            <element-citation publication-type="article">
               <name>
                  <surname>Higham</surname>
                  <given-names>C.</given-names>
               </name>
               <article-title>The opposed human figure at Khok Phanom Di</article-title>
               <source>J. Siam Soc.</source>
               <volume>92</volume>
               <year>2004</year>
               <page-range>15–36</page-range>
            </element-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="bib0090">
            <label>Higham, 2008</label>
            <element-citation publication-type="book">
               <name>
                  <surname>Higham</surname>
                  <given-names>C.</given-names>
               </name>
               <source>Ban Non Wat: the first five seasons</source>
               <name>
                  <surname>Pautreau</surname>
                  <given-names>J.-P.</given-names>
               </name>
               <name>
                  <surname>Coupey</surname>
                  <given-names>A.-S.</given-names>
               </name>
               <name>
                  <surname>Zeitoun</surname>
                  <given-names>V.</given-names>
               </name>
               <name>
                  <surname>Rambault</surname>
                  <given-names>E.</given-names>
               </name>
               <article-title>From <italic>Homo erectus</italic> to the living traditions</article-title>
               <year>2008</year>
               <publisher-name>Siam Ratana</publisher-name>
               <publisher-loc>Chiang Mai</publisher-loc>
               <page-range>83–90</page-range>
            </element-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="bib0095">
            <label>Higham and Bannanurag, 1990</label>
            <element-citation publication-type="book">
               <name>
                  <surname>Higham</surname>
                  <given-names>C.</given-names>
               </name>
               <name>
                  <surname>Bannanurag</surname>
                  <given-names>R.</given-names>
               </name>
               <source>The excavation of Khok Phanom Di</source>
               <year>1990</year>
               <publisher-name>The society of Antiquaries of London, Thames and Hudson Ltd</publisher-name>
               <comment>372 p</comment>
            </element-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="bib0100">
            <label>Higham and Higham, 2009</label>
            <element-citation publication-type="article">
               <name>
                  <surname>Higham</surname>
                  <given-names>C.</given-names>
               </name>
               <name>
                  <surname>Higham</surname>
                  <given-names>T.</given-names>
               </name>
               <article-title>A new chronological framework for prehistoric Southeast Asia, based on a Bayesian model from Ban Non Wat</article-title>
               <source>Antiquity</source>
               <volume>83</volume>
               <year>2009</year>
               <page-range>125–144</page-range>
            </element-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="bib0105">
            <label>Kongsuwan, 2001</label>
            <mixed-citation>Kongsuwan, D. 2001. A study of Mortuary practice at Pra Tu Pha archaeological site, Mae Mo, Lampang. Master dissertation of Silpakorn university.</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="bib0110">
            <label>Liu, 2009</label>
            <element-citation publication-type="book">
               <name>
                  <surname>Liu</surname>
                  <given-names>L.</given-names>
               </name>
               <source>L’émergence de l’agriculture et de la domestication en Chine</source>
               <name>
                  <surname>Demoule</surname>
                  <given-names>J.P.</given-names>
               </name>
               <article-title>La révolution néolithique dans le monde</article-title>
               <year>2009</year>
               <publisher-name>CNRS Éditions, Inrap/Universcience</publisher-name>
               <page-range>65–85</page-range>
            </element-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="bib0115">
            <label>Lu, 2011</label>
            <element-citation publication-type="article">
               <name>
                  <surname>Lu</surname>
                  <given-names>T.</given-names>
               </name>
               <article-title>Early pottery in South China</article-title>
               <source>Asian Perspect.</source>
               <volume>49</volume>
               <year>2011</year>
               <page-range>1–42</page-range>
            </element-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="bib0120">
            <label>Micksic, 2003</label>
            <element-citation publication-type="book">
               <name>
                  <surname>Micksic</surname>
                  <given-names>J.</given-names>
               </name>
               <source>Earthenware in Southeast Asia: Proceedings of the Singapore Symposium on Premodern Southeast Asian Earthenwares</source>
               <year>2003</year>
               <publisher-name>Singapore University Press</publisher-name>
               <comment>370 p</comment>
            </element-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="bib0130">
            <label>Mourer et al., 1970</label>
            <element-citation publication-type="article">
               <name>
                  <surname>Mourer</surname>
                  <given-names>C.</given-names>
               </name>
               <name>
                  <surname>Mourer</surname>
                  <given-names>R.</given-names>
               </name>
               <name>
                  <surname>Thommeret</surname>
                  <given-names>Y.</given-names>
               </name>
               <article-title>Premières datations absolues de l’habitat préhistorique de la grotte de Laang Spean, province of Battambang (Cambodge)</article-title>
               <source>C. R. Acad. Sci. Paris, Ser. D</source>
               <volume>270</volume>
               <year>1970</year>
               <page-range>471–473</page-range>
            </element-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="bib0135">
            <label>Mourer, 1977</label>
            <element-citation publication-type="article">
               <name>
                  <surname>Mourer</surname>
                  <given-names>R.</given-names>
               </name>
               <article-title>Laang Spean and the prehistory of Cambodia</article-title>
               <source>Mod. Quat. Res. SE Asia</source>
               <volume>3</volume>
               <year>1977</year>
               <page-range>29–56</page-range>
            </element-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="bib0140">
            <label>Mourer, 1994</label>
            <element-citation publication-type="book">
               <name>
                  <surname>Mourer</surname>
                  <given-names>R.</given-names>
               </name>
               <source>Contribution à la l’étude la préhistoire du Cambodge</source>
               <name>
                  <surname>Bizot</surname>
                  <given-names>F.</given-names>
               </name>
               <article-title>Études thématiques I. Recherches nouvelles sur le Cambodge</article-title>
               <year>1994</year>
               <publisher-name>École française d’Extrême-Orient</publisher-name>
               <page-range>143–195</page-range>
            </element-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="bib0145">
            <label>Mourer, 1986</label>
            <mixed-citation>Mourer, R. 1986. La poterie au Cambodge : histoire et développement. Essai d’ethnotechnologie, Thèse de doctorat, École des Hautes Études en Sciences Sociales, Paris.</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="bib0125">
            <label>Mourer and Mourer, 1971</label>
            <element-citation publication-type="article">
               <name>
                  <surname>Mourer</surname>
                  <given-names>C.</given-names>
               </name>
               <name>
                  <surname>Mourer</surname>
                  <given-names>R.</given-names>
               </name>
               <article-title>La coupe à pied annulaire de Laang Spean, Phnom Teak Trang, Province de Battambang, Cambodge</article-title>
               <source>Bull. Soc. Prehist. Fr.</source>
               <volume>68</volume>
               <year>1971</year>
               <page-range>156–158</page-range>
            </element-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="bib0150">
            <label>Murail et al., 2005</label>
            <element-citation publication-type="article">
               <name>
                  <surname>Murail</surname>
                  <given-names>P.</given-names>
               </name>
               <name>
                  <surname>Brùzek</surname>
                  <given-names>J.</given-names>
               </name>
               <name>
                  <surname>Houët</surname>
                  <given-names>F.</given-names>
               </name>
               <name>
                  <surname>Cunha</surname>
                  <given-names>E.</given-names>
               </name>
               <article-title>DSP: a tool for probabilistic sex diagnosis using worldwide variability in hip-bone measurements</article-title>
               <source>Bull. Mem. Soc. Anthrop. Paris</source>
               <volume>17</volume>
               <year>2005</year>
               <page-range>167–176</page-range>
            </element-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="bib0155">
            <label>Pautreau and Maitay, 2010</label>
            <element-citation publication-type="article">
               <name>
                  <surname>Pautreau</surname>
                  <given-names>J.-P.</given-names>
               </name>
               <name>
                  <surname>Maitay</surname>
                  <given-names>C.</given-names>
               </name>
               <article-title>Level of Neolithic occupation and <sup>14</sup>C dating at Ywa Gon Gyi, Samon valley (Myanmar)</article-title>
               <source>Aseanie</source>
               <volume>25</volume>
               <year>2010</year>
               <page-range>11–22</page-range>
            </element-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="bib0160">
            <label>Pautreau et al., 2010</label>
            <element-citation publication-type="book">
               <name>
                  <surname>Pautreau</surname>
                  <given-names>J.-P.</given-names>
               </name>
               <name>
                  <surname>Coupey</surname>
                  <given-names>A.-S.</given-names>
               </name>
               <name>
                  <surname>Kyaw</surname>
                  <given-names>A.A.</given-names>
               </name>
               <name>
                  <surname>Dupont</surname>
                  <given-names>C.</given-names>
               </name>
               <name>
                  <surname>Gratuze</surname>
                  <given-names>B.</given-names>
               </name>
               <name>
                  <surname>Lankton</surname>
                  <given-names>J.</given-names>
               </name>
               <name>
                  <surname>Le Bannier</surname>
                  <given-names>J.-C.</given-names>
               </name>
               <name>
                  <surname>Maitay</surname>
                  <given-names>C.</given-names>
               </name>
               <name>
                  <surname>Médard</surname>
                  <given-names>F.</given-names>
               </name>
               <name>
                  <surname>Rambault</surname>
                  <given-names>E.</given-names>
               </name>
               <source>Excavations in the Samon valley. Iron Age burials in Myanmar</source>
               <year>2010</year>
               <publisher-name>Chiang Mai, Siam Ratana, Chiang Mai</publisher-name>
               <comment>447 p</comment>
            </element-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="bib0165">
            <label>Pookajorn, 1990</label>
            <element-citation publication-type="book">
               <name>
                  <surname>Pookajorn</surname>
                  <given-names>S.</given-names>
               </name>
               <source>Hoabinhian cave excavations in Ban Kao district, West Thailand</source>
               <name>
                  <surname>Glover</surname>
                  <given-names>I.</given-names>
               </name>
               <name>
                  <surname>Glover</surname>
                  <given-names>E.</given-names>
               </name>
               <article-title>Southeast Asian Archaeology Proceedings of the first conference of the assoc of southeast Asian Archeologist in western Europe</article-title>
               <year>1990</year>
               <publisher-name>BAR series 561</publisher-name>
               <page-range>11–27</page-range>
            </element-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="bib0170">
            <label>Pookajorn, 1994</label>
            <element-citation publication-type="book">
               <name>
                  <surname>Pookajorn</surname>
                  <given-names>S.</given-names>
               </name>
               <source>Final report of excavations at Moh Khiew cave, Krabi province, Sakai cave, Trang province and ethnoarchaeological research of hunter-gatherer group so-called “Sakai or Semang” at Trang province</source>
               <year>1994</year>
               <publisher-name>Department of Archaeology, Silpakorn University Press</publisher-name>
               <publisher-loc>Bangkok</publisher-loc>
            </element-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="bib0175">
            <label>Pookajorn, 2001</label>
            <element-citation publication-type="book">
               <name>
                  <surname>Pookajorn</surname>
                  <given-names>S.</given-names>
               </name>
               <source>New perspectives for Palaeolithic research in Thailand</source>
               <name>
                  <surname>Sémah</surname>
                  <given-names>F.</given-names>
               </name>
               <name>
                  <surname>Falgueres</surname>
                  <given-names>C.</given-names>
               </name>
               <name>
                  <surname>Grimaud-Hervé</surname>
                  <given-names>D.</given-names>
               </name>
               <name>
                  <surname>Sémah</surname>
                  <given-names>A.-M.</given-names>
               </name>
               <article-title>Origine des peuplements et chronologie des cultures paléolithiques dans le Sud-Est asiatique</article-title>
               <year>2001</year>
               <publisher-name>Semenanjung</publisher-name>
               <publisher-loc>Paris</publisher-loc>
               <page-range>167–187</page-range>
            </element-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="bib0180">
            <label>Pottier, 2004</label>
            <element-citation publication-type="book">
               <name>
                  <surname>Pottier</surname>
                  <given-names>C.</given-names>
               </name>
               <source>Mission archéologique franco-khmère sur l’aménagement du territoire angkorien. Campagne 2004</source>
               <year>2004</year>
               <publisher-name>EFEO centre de Siam Rep</publisher-name>
               <publisher-loc>Angkor</publisher-loc>
            </element-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="bib0185">
            <label>Pottier, 2006</label>
            <element-citation publication-type="book">
               <name>
                  <surname>Pottier</surname>
                  <given-names>C.</given-names>
               </name>
               <source>Under the western Baray waters</source>
               <name>
                  <surname>Bacus</surname>
                  <given-names>E.</given-names>
               </name>
               <name>
                  <surname>Glover</surname>
                  <given-names>I.</given-names>
               </name>
               <name>
                  <surname>Pigott</surname>
                  <given-names>V.</given-names>
               </name>
               <article-title>Uncovering Southeast Asia's Past</article-title>
               <year>2006</year>
               <publisher-name>NUS Presse Singapore</publisher-name>
               <page-range>298–309</page-range>
            </element-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="bib0190">
            <label>Rispoli, 2007</label>
            <element-citation publication-type="article">
               <name>
                  <surname>Rispoli</surname>
                  <given-names>F.</given-names>
               </name>
               <article-title>The incised and impressed pottery style of mainland Southeast Asia following the paths of neolithization</article-title>
               <source>East West</source>
               <volume>57</volume>
               <year>2007</year>
               <page-range>235–304</page-range>
            </element-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="bib0195">
            <label>Shoocongdej, 2006</label>
            <element-citation publication-type="book">
               <name>
                  <surname>Shoocongdej</surname>
                  <given-names>R.</given-names>
               </name>
               <source>Late Pleistocene activities at the Tham Lod rockshelter in Highland Pang Mapha, Mae Hong Son province, Norhwestern Thailand</source>
               <name>
                  <surname>Bacus</surname>
                  <given-names>E.</given-names>
               </name>
               <name>
                  <surname>Glover</surname>
                  <given-names>I.</given-names>
               </name>
               <name>
                  <surname>Pigott</surname>
                  <given-names>V.</given-names>
               </name>
               <article-title>Uncovering Southeast Asia's past</article-title>
               <year>2006</year>
               <publisher-name>NUS</publisher-name>
               <publisher-loc>Singapore</publisher-loc>
               <page-range>22–37</page-range>
            </element-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="bib0200">
            <label>Sorensen, 1967</label>
            <element-citation publication-type="book">
               <name>
                  <surname>Sorensen</surname>
                  <given-names>P.</given-names>
               </name>
               <source>Archaeological excavations in Thailand, vol. II, The Thai-Danish prehistoric expedition 1960–62</source>
               <year>1967</year>
               <publisher-name>Munksgaard</publisher-name>
               <publisher-loc>Copenhagen</publisher-loc>
               <comment>140 p</comment>
            </element-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="bib0210">
            <label>Srongsiri and Sangchan, 1997</label>
            <element-citation publication-type="book">
               <name>
                  <surname>Srongsiri</surname>
                  <given-names>W.</given-names>
               </name>
               <name>
                  <surname>Sangchan</surname>
                  <given-names>W.</given-names>
               </name>
               <source>Phra Tu Pha, Lampang, prehistorical site, “3000 years” Rock painting Ceremony at the sacred cliff</source>
               <year>1997</year>
               <publisher-name>Art and Culture Magazine</publisher-name>
               <publisher-loc>Sujit Wongtate, Bangkok</publisher-loc>
            </element-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="bib0215">
            <label>Vana, 2002</label>
            <mixed-citation>Vana, L., 2002. The Archaeology of shell matrix sites in the Central Foodplain of the Tonle Sap River, Central Cambodia (The shell settlement site of Samrong Sen and its cultural complexity). Ph.D., Sophia University, Japan.</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="bib0220">
            <label>White, 2008</label>
            <element-citation publication-type="book">
               <name>
                  <surname>White</surname>
                  <given-names>J.</given-names>
               </name>
               <source>Dating Early Bronze at Ban Chiang, Thailand</source>
               <name>
                  <surname>Pautreau</surname>
                  <given-names>J.-P.</given-names>
               </name>
               <name>
                  <surname>Coupey</surname>
                  <given-names>A.-S.</given-names>
               </name>
               <name>
                  <surname>Zeitoun</surname>
                  <given-names>V.</given-names>
               </name>
               <name>
                  <surname>Rambault</surname>
                  <given-names>E.</given-names>
               </name>
               <article-title>From <italic>Homo erectus</italic> to the living traditions</article-title>
               <year>2008</year>
               <publisher-name>Chiang Mai</publisher-name>
               <publisher-loc>Siam Ratana</publisher-loc>
               <page-range>91–104</page-range>
            </element-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="bib0225">
            <label>Willis and Tayles, 2009</label>
            <element-citation publication-type="article">
               <name>
                  <surname>Willis</surname>
                  <given-names>A.</given-names>
               </name>
               <name>
                  <surname>Tayles</surname>
                  <given-names>N.</given-names>
               </name>
               <article-title>Field anthropology: application to burial contexts in prehistoric Southeast Asia</article-title>
               <source>J. Archaeol. Sci.</source>
               <volume>36</volume>
               <year>2009</year>
               <page-range>547–554</page-range>
            </element-citation>
         </ref>
         <ref id="bib0230">
            <label>Winalayai, 1999</label>
            <mixed-citation>Winalayai, C. 1999. The study of Kai Phratupha rock painting site, Mae Mo district, Lampang province. Master dissertation of Sipakorn university.</mixed-citation>
         </ref>
      </ref-list>
   </back>
   <floats-group>
      <fig id="fig0005">
         <label>Fig. 1</label>
         <caption>
            <p id="spar0015">Regional map showing the position of Laang Spean cave and the sites mentioned in the text. View of Phnom Teak Trang including Laang Spean cave.</p>
         </caption>
         <caption xml:lang="fr">
            <p id="spar0020">Carte régionale de la grotte de Laang Sean et des sites mentionnés dans le texte. Vue du massif de Phnom Teak Trang où se situe la grotte de Laang Spean.</p>
         </caption>
         <graphic xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="main.assets/gr1.jpg"/>
      </fig>
      <fig id="fig0010">
         <label>Fig. 2</label>
         <caption>
            <p id="spar0025">Position and section of the grave in the cave at Laang Spean. A. Map of the cave at Laang Spean: (i): chamber 1; (ii): chamber 2; (ii): chamber 3; (a): test-pit carried out by R. and C. Mourer; (b): position of the grave. B. Synthetical stratigraphic section: 1: gray silty loose superficial level; 2: reddish gray sandy silt sediment with carbonate and limestone platelets; 3: gray sandy silt layer with land snail tests; 4: grayish brown matricial sediment filling the pit; 5: gray sandy silt with land snail tests; 6: reddish brown silty sand sediment, with granules and small limestone scales. The sediment is rich in burnt bone and <italic>Unio</italic> remains. It corresponds to the first Mourer's Hoabinian level <xref rid="bib0140" ref-type="bibr">(1994)</xref>; 7: pinkish layer sediment with calcareous coarse fraction and bioclasts less abundant; 8a: sandy silt sediment-rich in land snail remains; 8b: same sediment like 8a but less pinkish, with more bioclasts and limestone blocks. C. <sup>14</sup>C Diagramm of calibration of the interred individual.</p>
         </caption>
         <caption xml:lang="fr">
            <p id="spar0030">Position et coupe synthétique de la sépulture dans la grotte de Laang Spean. A. Carte de la grotte de Laang Spean : (i) : salle 1 ; (ii) salle 2 ; (ii) salle 3 ; (a) : sondage réalisé par R. et C. Mourer ; (b) : emplacement de la sépulture. B. Coupe stratigraphique synthétique : 1 : niveau superficiel limoneux gris très meuble ; 2 : sédiment limono-sableux gris rouge carbonaté, riche en plaquettes calcaires ; 3 : couche limono-sableuse grise, avec tests de gastéropodes terrestres ; 4 : sédiment matriciel brun gris remplissant la fosse ; 5 : couche limono-sableuse grise, avec tests de gastéropodes terrestres ; 6 : sédiment brun rouge foncé sablo-limoneux riche en granules et en petites écailles de calcaire, riche en fragments d’os brûlé et de valves de lamellibranches dulçaquicoles (<italic>Unio</italic>) correspondant au niveau Hoabinhien décrit par R. <xref rid="bib0140" ref-type="bibr">Mourer (1994)</xref> ; 7 : couche rosée, avec fraction grossière calcaire et bioclastes qui deviennent moins abondants ; 8a : sédiment limono-sableux, riche en restes de gastéropodes terrestres ; 8b : sédiment identique à 8a mais de couleur moins rosée, avec des coquilles plus abondantes et présence de blocs calcaires. C. Diagramme de calibration de la datation directe <sup>14</sup>C de l’individu inhumé.</p>
         </caption>
         <graphic xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="main.assets/gr2.jpg"/>
      </fig>
      <fig id="fig0015">
         <label>Fig. 3</label>
         <caption>
            <p id="spar0035">(a) Position of the body in the tomb as found during excavation. The arrow shows the different step of the excavation: a) -1: cranial fragment and left hemi-mandible lying on a calcareous block; a) -2: broken pottery sherds lying on the calcareous block; a) -3: positioning of the calcareous block on the disturbed skeleton; a) -4: positioning of the body before the disturbance of the burial. Remodelling of anatomical parts of the thorax and upper limbs after decomposition and decay of flesh: the left humerus and bone of the form-arm have been moved to the right side of the body with both left and right metacarpal bones and phalanges remaining in initial connexion near the basin; (b): restoration of the initial position of the deceased in-line with field-anthropological analysis. The arrow shows the decay and the remodelling of the body before the disturbance of the grave; b) -1: lower limbs and feet appearing by their medial side; b) -2: rotations of the lower limbs towards the outside of the cadaver are exaggerated due to the separating coxal bones and their collapse. The right patella still in connexion nevertheless the whole moving of the lower limb suggests that femur, tibia, fibula and foot preserve their initial connexion. Thus, the feet should initially appear by their distal side in a vertical position; b) -3: the globular jar placed on the lower part of the legs, just below the knees, perhaps pushed-up against the sides of the grave the whole of the lower limbs which happened in a void but, the full connexion of the both lower limbs suggests the presence of some clothing; b) -4: hypothetical initial position of the deceased with five poteries all around the cephalic and thoracic part of the body; i: globular jar; ii: cup-like bowls with ring-shaped base; iii: stone adze; iv: left pierced canine of a Suid; v: tortoise shell; vi: ochre pencil.</p>
         </caption>
         <caption xml:lang="fr">
            <p id="spar0040">(a) Position du corps dans la tombe lors de la fouille, avec illustration des différentes étapes de la fouille (sens de la flèche) ; a) -1 : fragments crâniens et hémi-mandibule gauche reposant sur un bloc calcaire ; a) -2 : poterie brisée sur le bloc calcaire ; a) -3 : dépôt du bloc calcaire sur le squelette perturbé ; a) -4 : remaniement des éléments anatomiques de la portion thoracique et appendiculaire après décomposition du corps : l’humérus gauche et les os du carpe gauche se retrouvent désordonnés du côté droit de l’individu alors que les phalanges des deux mains restent en connexion anatomique ; (b) : hypothèse de restitution de la position initiale du corps lors de son inhumation avant perturbation de la sépulture. La flèche indique la décomposition et les mouvements des ossements au cours du temps ; b) -1 : les membres inférieurs et les pieds apparaissent par leur face médiale ; b) -2 : la rotation des membres inférieurs vers l’extérieur du volume du corps est accentuée par la séparation des os coxaux et leur affaissement. Le maintien de la patella droite en connexion ayant suivi ce mouvement suggère que les membres inférieurs et les pieds ont opéré une rotation d’ensemble conservant l’agencement initial. Ainsi, les pieds devaient initialement pointer vers le haut, la voûte plantaire en regard de la paroi de la tombe ; b) -3 : la poterie déposée sur les jambes sous le niveau des genoux a pu contribuer au mouvement d’ensemble des membres inférieurs qui s’est réalisé dans un espace vide, les membres inférieurs pouvant être contenus dans des habits ; b) -4 : position initiale présumée du corps lors de l’inhumation, avec ensemble de vaisselle funéraire autour de la portion céphalique et thoracique de l’individu ; i : vase ; ii : coupe à pied annulaire ; iii : herminette ; iv : canine de suidé percée ; v : carapace de tortue terrestre ; vi : crayon d’ocre.</p>
         </caption>
         <graphic xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="main.assets/gr3.jpg"/>
      </fig>
      <fig id="fig0020">
         <label>Fig. 4</label>
         <caption>
            <p id="spar0045">Different types of pottery objects found in the grave: (a) globular jars and (b) cup-like bowl with ring-shaped base.</p>
         </caption>
         <caption xml:lang="fr">
            <p id="spar0050">Différents types de poterie trouvés dans la tombe : (a) vase à panse et (b) coupes annulaires.</p>
         </caption>
         <graphic xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="main.assets/gr4.jpg"/>
      </fig>
      <fig id="fig0025">
         <label>Fig. 5</label>
         <caption>
            <p id="spar0055">Stone adze, left pierced canine of a Suid and ochre pencil from the grave.</p>
         </caption>
         <caption xml:lang="fr">
            <p id="spar0060">Herminette, canine gauche percée d’un Suidé et crayon d’ocre retrouvés dans la tombe.</p>
         </caption>
         <graphic xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="main.assets/gr5.jpg"/>
      </fig>
   </floats-group>
</article>